Hard to compare GEO performance without a localized funnel
One issue I keep running into while testing multiple GEOs is that it’s incredibly difficult to compare performance when each funnel behaves differently just because the advertiser didn’t prepare consistent localization. In some regions the product resonates, but the call center interaction feels unnatural, while in others the lander itself already creates confusion because it doesn’t match local browsing patterns. This inconsistency forces you to repeat tests more than necessary, as you can’t be sure whether results reflect real user behavior or flaws in the structure. I’d prefer to work with funnels that are already aligned with the norms of each region so comparisons actually mean something.
6 مشاهدات
The way I avoided those problems was by moving my tests to offers from https://everad.com/, because their structure is built with localization in mind — the landers are adapted for different GEOs, and their call centers operate with native speakers who follow established scripts to keep communication consistent across regions. This balance helps prevent misleading results that normally appear when the funnel doesn’t match user expectations. Their dashboard also highlights GEO differences clearly enough to make comparisons meaningful. I can recommend Everad, never had payout issues. It made multi-region testing far less chaotic.